Quickly Comparing and Contrasting an Individual Voluntary Arrangement with Bankruptcy
In wanting to deal with personal insolvency it’s almost inevitable that the debtor will have to look into the two most important solutions to be found in the Great Britain, namely going into an Individual Voluntary Arrangement (IVA) or petitioning for Bankruptcy. Naturally there can in particular cases be other more favourable options available to the borrower but they mostly belong to the category of the kindness of strangers or of the generosity of a family member. In reality, because doing nothing is not an alternative, most individuals are going to opt for one of the two pillars of British legislation regulating the resolution of personal insolvency. In the end, no matter what the quality or quantum of help and advice sought, it will fall to the insolvent individual to decide which path to go for.
To be able to that fateful choice, the debtor really ought to consider the pros and negatives of each solution from their own personal position while taking into account that other interested individuals, in particular creditors, might take a different view of the matter. Let’s explore the key benefits of an IVA to begin with.
An IVA offers the insolvent debtor with relief from their obligations while enabling them to repay as much of their liabilities as possible to their creditors. It avoids the stigma of bankruptcy with its linked disabilities, restrictions and responsibilities while at the same time it permits the borrower to retain better control over assets by being able to keep hold of their home and car. He or she can retain their employment or if doing business on a self-employed basis, they can often stay in business for the entire time period of the IVA, contributing to greater yields for lenders.
An IVA is binding on all creditors, including dissenting creditors, provided the IVA proposal is supported by 75% or more of voting creditors, as measured by value. From the point of view of creditors, an IVA is likely to yield a higher level of realizations than in bankruptcy, and the administrative costs of an IVA are considerably lower than those in bankruptcy. These two factors lead to higher returns for creditors. The debtor is subject to less publicity in an IVA and avoids the mandatory publication in newspapers and other periodicals which is standard practice in bankruptcy. Should the debtor’s circumstances change significantly over the duration of the IVA its terms may, with the agreement of creditors, be changed.
There is minimal and reducing court involvement in an IVA and government policy has been to simplify IVA processes for the benefit of debtors and lenders alike. The supervision of IVAs is nonetheless highly controlled. The insolvency practitioner’s activities are subject to monitoring and auditing by his or her own regulatory body which wields considerable powers of sanction for non-compliance. The insolvency industry overall is controlled by the DTI with oversight review by the OFT for the consumer.
Once an IVA is approved, creditor contact with the debtor ceases, interest on all unsecured debts is frozen and penalties are stopped. All debts are dealt with and written off in a known and finite time period, usually five years. In most IVAs the debtor makes affordable monthly payments out of disposable income and may have to contribute a lump sum if he or she owns property which is in positive and realisable equity. A short term IVA may be approved by creditors where the debtor has little or no disposable income but can offer a single one-off lump sum payment, with the funds usually coming from the proceeds of the sale of assets or through the assistance of a third party such as a family member.
There are also some down sides with an IVA. The insolvent borrower has to pay for the set-up, administration and disbursement expenses of the IVA. There isn’t any time related automatic discharge from an IVA comparable to what is available in bankruptcy. The duration of an IVA in which payments must be made is often five years compared to a maximum of three years in bankruptcy. If the IVA is not agreed upon, lenders are free to use other legal actions such as petitioning for the debtor’s bankruptcy, getting court judgments against the borrower or registering charges on the debtor’s assets. A high level of creditor acceptance is needed to approve the IVA. At the very least 75% by value of the voting creditors must consent to the debtor’s proposals for the IVA to be accepted.
Creditors also may insist on modifications to a debtor’s IVA proposal which usually have the effect of increasing the debtor’s monthly contributions. Creditors often curtail the debtor’s allowances for living expenses to a greater extent than what is allowed in bankruptcy. The increased financial burden on the debtor may cause the IVA to fail during its term of supervision if the debtor is unable to sustain the enhanced level of contributions demanded. For the last number of years creditors have used the services of voting agencies to act aggressively on their behalf at the meetings of creditors where IVAs are accepted or rejected. These agencies seek to maximize the dividend yield from the IVA on behalf of creditors. They do this by seeking enhanced contributions from the debtor and by reducing the fees of the insolvency practitioner (IP). This two-pronged approach increases the probability that the IVA may fail in supervision, if the debtor is unable to sustain payments, and makes the IVA less commercially viable for the IP. Using such voting agencies adds costs to the IVA process but creditors may feel that efficiencies achieved and increased debtor contributions result in higher net dividend yields.
The debtor is prohibited from engaging in any further borrowing during the life of the IVA, except with the express permission of the supervisor and creditors. The debtor will suffer the consequences of a poor credit rating even after completion of the term of the IVA with his or her name continuing to appear on credit files, as maintained by the credit reference agencies, for six years from the commencement of the IVA or from the date when the default was first registered.
Let’s look next at the benefits of bankruptcy. Starting up the process is quite simple since insolvent borrowers may petition for their own bankruptcy. Lenders may also petition for a debtor’s bankruptcy. The cost of petitioning is comparitively low – approximately 700 at the moment. No other legal costs are incurred. Citizen Advice Bureau officers and Court officers can assist the borrower in completing simple and easy documents and submitting them. The borrower is automatically discharged from bankruptcy after one year, as long as it is a first time bankruptcy. Most, if not all, debts will not survive the bankruptcy. All communication involving the insolvent borrower and creditors ceases with the borrower enjoying the consequent reduced pressure and worry.
The timeframe in which the debtor has to make contributions is limited. Income Payments Orders (IPOs) and Income Payments Agreements (IPAs) are limited to three years and often no IPO or IPA is applied where the debtor’s disposable income is reckoned to be too low. The borrower benefits from more generous I&E allowances than are permitted in an IVA and as a result is left with more money on which to survive, although this advantage has declined somewhat in recent years.
There are also considerable downsides to bankruptcy. Until recently and even today the key issue for most people was the stigma of bankruptcy with its associated disabilities, obligations and restrictions which made it hard and frequently impossible for the borrower to trade (commence or continue) or to obtain or hold on to a job. Bankruptcy can be a career breaker with many professions and trades imposing sanctions on insolvent people in their organizations, which includes the ultimate sanction of expulsion. The insolvent person also is faced with possible liability for any bankrupt offences he or she may have committed. The trustee has powers to challenge the validity of any past transactions if they appear to be preferential or at an under-value. Some bankruptcy restrictions may be put on for between two and fifteen years.
In bankruptcy, the borrower loses control of his or her property, and is prone to lose their home or their share of it. The debtor’s bad credit score persists even after release from bankruptcy and their name will go on to appear on credit files which are maintained by the credit reference agencies for six years from the commencement of bankruptcy. The debtor cannot embark on any additional borrowing prior to discharge without the express approval of the trustee. The biggest downside for creditors is that the excessive costs of bankruptcy cause reduced dividends and in many bankruptcies, lenders get nothing at all.
In reaching a decision, the insolvent borrower can tick the boxes that pertain to him or her for both processes. If making the decision remains too difficult, it makes sense to talk with an insolvency professional who can clear up any remaining concerns, considering the personal circumstances of the borrower and especially in relation to what the borrower hopes to achieve in relation to paying back as much as possible of the debts, circumventing stigma and rebuilding credit worthiness.
Looking for reliable debt help ? Get inside info on how and where to find the best now in our complete guide to all you need to know about Ivas.
August 26, 2011
|
Posted by Alina Clark
Categories:
Tags: